Summer 2021 (Volume 31, Number 2)
Patient, Rheumatologist and Nurse Perspectives on Multidisciplinary Rheumatology Care Assessments in B.C.
By Glory Apantaku, MSc; Michelle Teo, MD, FRCPC; and Mark Harrison, MSc, PhD
Download PDF
Since 2011, rheumatologists in British Columbia
(B.C.) have been able to use a “Multidisciplinary
Care Assessment” billing code which provides additional
reimbursement when they see patients with certain
rheumatic conditions along with a nurse. The code was
designed to provide patients with counselling and education
from rheumatology nurses, but was not prescriptive in
what this comprised. It was also anticipated that rheumatologists
might change the way they work, freeing up time
to see more patients.
We sought to describe the delivery of multidisciplinary
care in B.C. under this billing code and its perceived impact
on care by conducting 45 interviews with 21 patients, 12
rheumatologists and 12 nurses from private and community
practices located in four of the five health authorities in
B.C. We found variety in the way multidisciplinary care was
delivered with individual practices adopting differing appointment
structures. These fell into three broad categories.
Some practices had sequential appointments with patients
spending time individually with the rheumatologist
and the nurse. Some used shared appointments where patients,
rheumatologists and nurses had a three-way conversation.
Others had a blend of these shared and sequential
structures, with patients getting time to debrief with the
nurse after the shared portion of the appointment.
Patients appreciated having nurses involved as it gave
them more contact with a health professional. They described
having informative discussions with their nurses which
made them feel more knowledgeable about their life-long
condition and medications. Rheumatologists felt having
nurses in their practice improved efficiency, increasing the
numbers of patients seen and reducing wait times. Their
interactions with patients were more productive as they
could concentrate on addressing specific medical details
whilst assured that their nurses covered patient education,
training about medications and disease management. We
found educating patients was one of the core roles nurses
performed in this interprofessional care model.
Some rheumatologists and nurses discussed initial difficulties
with adopting this way of working, primarily with
regard to the initial training of nurses, which was often
rheumatologist-led and time consuming, given the absence
of specific guidance on the role and scope of nurses
under this billing code. However, rheumatologists were
able to learn from their colleagues and customize the role
of nurses to best fit their practices; after the initial adaptation
time, rheumatologists described the addition of
nurses to their practices as rewarding for them and their
patients.
The rheumatologists and patients we spoke to in this
study were positive about the role of nurses in Multidisciplinary
Care Assessments and believe that rheumatology
nurses improve overall care for patients.
Glory Apantaku, MSc
Research Assistant, University of British Columbia,
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vancouver, British Columbia
Michelle M. Teo, MD, FRCPC
Rheumatologist, Penticton Regional Hospital
Penticton, British Columbia
Mark Harrison, MSc, PhD
Associate Professor, University of British Columbia,
Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Vancouver, British Columbia
You are invited to submit abstracts for presentation during the 2022 CRA & AHPA Annual Scientific Meeting
Deadline for submissions is October 8, 2021. Details will be available at asm.rheum.ca.
|